Published2023

Integrated Sponge City Approach for Kosasthalaiyar Basin

Systematizing blue-green infrastructure across 170 acres into 3 street tiers and 3 open-space types.

  • urban-design
  • flood
  • climate
  • planning
  • 170Acres in the feasibility study area
  • 3Street tiers systematized — primary, secondary, tertiary
  • 3Open-space categories — major, local, wasteland
  • 6Person design team

Problem

Chennai’s grey stormwater infrastructure was not built for the rainfall the city now sees. The Kosasthalaiyar basin needed a feasibility study for blue-green infrastructure (BGI) and nature-based solutions that could actually be layered onto an existing, dense residential grid — not a clean-slate redesign, but a retrofit strategy for streets, open spaces, and private plots as they already exist around MMDA Colony.

Approach

As design and technical lead, I co-led the team through a Detailed Feasibility Report and Technical Project Report for a ~170-acre study area, and a Detailed Project Report for a sponge-park pilot site within it. Detailed runoff coefficients and dynamic modeling in EPA’s Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) quantified what each intervention would actually do to runoff, rather than relying on rule-of-thumb estimates.

Aerial land-cover map of a dense residential grid in MMDA Colony, Chennai, bordered by Chinnamattur Road, Kamaraj Road, and Periyathoppu Lake, beside a diagram of the same grid overlaid with a green blue-infrastructure intervention network connecting parks, schools, and open spaces via primary and secondary green corridors.
The retrofit logic in one pair of images: the existing block-by-block land cover on the left becomes the substrate for a connected BGI network on the right — corridors, not isolated interventions.Source: Professional Portfolio - Abdul Kalam 10MB.pdf, p. 11.
Methods behind the feasibility study.
SourceProductAccess
EPA SWMMDynamic runoff-coefficient modelingApplied to quantify BGI impact
Hydrological modelingFlooding-node identification in stormwater conduitsTeam-developed methodology
Site survey and GIS mappingDetailed land-cover classificationField survey + desk GIS

Results

The interventions are systematized rather than bespoke: three street tiers — primary, secondary, tertiary — each get a matched catalogue running from simple (tree planting, bioswales) to advanced (rain gardens with storage, rainwater harvesting), and three open-space types — major, local, and wasteland — get the same simple-to-advanced treatment scaled to their size and existing condition.

A catalogue of before-and-after isometric diagrams for primary, secondary, and tertiary streets and for major, local, and wasteland open spaces, each showing a baseline condition, a simple intervention, and an advanced intervention, alongside two street-section diagrams comparing the existing storm-drain-only scenario against a proposed scenario with bioswales, storage tanks, recharge pits, and permeable wetland at the outfall.
Every street tier and open-space type gets the same simple-to-advanced ladder, so a municipality can fund the cheap intervention first and the expensive one later without redesigning anything.Source: Professional Portfolio - Abdul Kalam 10MB.pdf, p. 12.

The street-section comparison makes the payoff legible end to end: the existing scenario routes everything to a storm drain and an outfall point: the proposed scenario intercepts water at every stage — storage tanks, recharge pits, bioswales, sunken courts — before it ever reaches the lake.

What I’d do differently

The feasibility report quantifies runoff reduction per intervention type but not the maintenance burden each one adds for the corporation that has to keep it working after handover. A five-year operations cost alongside the capital cost would make the simple-versus-advanced choice a genuine trade-off rather than an obviously-better one.

Share this page

https://abdulkalam.pages.dev/projects/kosasthalaiyar-sponge-city/

Scan to open this page. Download the SVG for print.